tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5863708916163727470.post5932504161147129303..comments2023-06-15T07:32:47.359-07:00Comments on The Frustrating Fraud: CHACONAS: AN INTOLERABLE INTERPRETATIONCaustic Logichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5863708916163727470.post-78528284272434783672008-06-11T04:12:00.000-07:002008-06-11T04:12:00.000-07:00Also we can note as support for this fusion interp...Also we can note as support for this fusion interpretation the timeline of it. As the graphic shows, radar tracks from the C-130 crossing the river to 77's impact takes almost exactly three minutes. Chaconas on his plane:<BR/><BR/>“it was about three minutes that plane was in the air.”Caustic Logichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5863708916163727470.post-38992934028662070762008-06-07T01:27:00.000-07:002008-06-07T01:27:00.000-07:00"You can't say what the captain saw was a C-130 be..."You can't say what the captain saw was a C-130 because he saw it well before the explosion. There should have been no other planes in the area." <BR/>- Avenger <BR/>http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=15517&view=findpost&p=14724378<BR/><BR/>Oops, we all know how wrong that is. <BR/><BR/>But if he saw a gray 4-propellor cargo plane, he'd know it, right?<BR/><BR/>VinCaustic Logichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5863708916163727470.post-90471203898409121842008-06-06T03:32:00.000-07:002008-06-06T03:32:00.000-07:00I've added this: ETA: And the fact that CIT passed...I've added this: <BR/>ETA: And the fact that CIT passed up the chance to show him their ever-present E4B and C130 photos [nowhere in the video] for comparison indicates that they knew it too.<BR/><BR/>And I'll also add this. How could a 4 engine prop plane EVER be mistaken for a 2-engine airliner? Everyone can tell the difference! <BR/>http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/single/?p=24858&t=Caustic Logichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5863708916163727470.post-21386567854702094382008-06-05T16:12:00.000-07:002008-06-05T16:12:00.000-07:00>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's it?!What a cop out!Oh, a...>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's it?!<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>What a cop out!<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>Oh, and no, that's not it. I have more, just not the time to put it together. I may or may not post updates. Cliff's notes version is far more potent and should suufice for most.Caustic Logichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5863708916163727470.post-41851338667146163632008-06-05T14:38:00.000-07:002008-06-05T14:38:00.000-07:00See how easy it is now to register your opinions? ...See how easy it is now to register your opinions? Er wait, sorry, your hard-won facts. <BR/><BR/>He did say he saw it turn, though he wasn't as detailed about it as he was the final maneuver, and he may have. with 77. He may be just deducing or willfully deducing, I don't know how to tell the difference. 2/3 of the path he saw is accounted for by REAL planes that were there, which is why he isn'tCaustic Logichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5863708916163727470.post-67722770879336079352008-06-05T09:38:00.000-07:002008-06-05T09:38:00.000-07:00That's it?!What a cop out!After all this time THAT...That's it?!<BR/><BR/>What a cop out!<BR/><BR/>After all this time THAT is all you have to say on Chaconas? Still holding on to the absurd C-130 nonsense? Suggesting that he DEDUCED a bank even though he clearly and very explicitly described how he SAW it?<BR/><BR/>You know how desperate you look right? No wonder it took you so long to address him!<BR/><BR/>The DC flight path is backed up by Citizen Investigation Teamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12680974306370234543noreply@blogger.com