Adam Larson / Caustic Logic
The Frustrating Fraud
July 16 2007
last updated July 19
Connecting the Dots
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a66a/0a66a9dee1b8518ec1be54d67df6758cdf10dc40" alt=""
The final line of the journey as it passed east of its origin at Dulles, seems from here uneventful. But in these same early days reports surfaced of a tight, controlled, implausible loop over eastern Virginia, thought by many beyond the reported skills of the alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour. Facing the west wall, Flight 77 was said to have turned 270°-360° to hit - the west wall – oddly enough, the side just renovated to withstand bombs and impacts, largely empty, and across the building from the Defense Secretary’s Office. [more on the radar blind spot and the impact location in "From the blind spot to the empty side."]
Few if any eyewitness accounts seem to address the grand loop, since it was simply too big to have been seen by any one person – the first part of it was perhaps too high to attract much attention, but as it approached the Navy Annex and continued to lose altitude, it attracted more witnesses in its last several seconds, by which time it was going straight towards the Pentagon’s west wall. With such published accounts as the early cornerstone of our awareness of the attack, this magical loop remained largely invisible, possibly another government lie.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8f89/f8f89cc4e0e0790c81695a25d191343f9ec82248" alt=""
The Radar Record
Among the too-vague early report was this from the ever-unbelievable Vice President Cheney, five days after the attack: "it entered the danger zone and looked like it was headed for the White House [...] Didn't circle it, but was headed on a track into it. [...] It turned away and, we think, flew a circle and came back in and then hit the Pentagon. And that's what the radar track looks like." [2] Five days later CBS News reported “radar shows Flight 77 did a downward spiral, turning almost a complete circle,” after which “the jetliner disappeared from radar at 9:37 and less than a minute later it clipped the tops of street lights and plowed into the Pentagon at 460 mph.” [3]
It was another month before radar specialist Danielle O’Brien, on duty at the Dulles ATC tower on 9/11, told ABC News’ 20/20 “it was an unidentified plane to the southwest of Dulles, moving at a very high rate of speed [...] I had literally a blip and nothing more.” As it headed towards the Pentagon, “it was just a countdown. Ten miles west. Nine miles west […] And it went six, five, four. And I had it in my mouth to say, three, and all of a sudden the plane turned away. In the room, it was almost a sense of relief.” But the turn continued until it was much lower and facing the same direction, after which O’Brien tersely summed up "we lost radar contact with that aircraft [...] and then the Washington National controllers came over our speakers [saying] The Pentagon's been hit.” [4]
O’Brien’s interview, aired in late October 2001, was accompanied by a radar screen graphic with a south loop of near 360 degrees off the east-bound flight as seen on radar screens. Seen briefly by millions, perhaps many thought this arc of dots just a guess or irrelevant, but in fact this same path would prove accurate and come back to bite them in the butt five years later. [Other than the red lettering, this picture is a direct screenshot from the program, viewable here.]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6cd2/d6cd2beba5f00f3730476d95e6799c42f58857f8" alt=""
Official Reports: Zooming the Lump
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38ae1/38ae10582ce5c1ab0775840057b057c1926b4aae" alt=""
That document was finally released via numerous FOIA requests in August 2006 and posted online from numerous angles. Finally we see a zoom in on the mysterious grand loop [see below]. First we see their overall flight path, printed big enough to show a silly little loop at the end [blue box], and also a detail of the loop all on its own page, faded yellow on a pale orange topo map [red box]. This is labeled in the report as “DC area flight path,” so possibly from ATC radar track, while the overall flight path above it is said to be from the matching FDR/radar data. [6]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18d99/18d994d5c0f3d76ac5590404e758d3694a5850fb" alt=""
The Black Box
Additional Flight Data Recorder information further verifies this loop. The Specilaist’s Factual Report of Investigation (SFRI), is an NTSB documented drawing exclusively on the full Black Box readings, also released in the 2006 rush. It has all functioning parameters graphed out for the duration of the flight, spread out over 17 pages; The basics -altitude, airspeed, and magnetic heading - are reproduced on each page. Here is the clearest extraction I've taken of this, edited to show a zoomed-in final minutes reading. All lines and values are accurate according to the bars at right and left. [7]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42091/42091584a91325fc9191fb8d3c5f2ea4a9cde9ee" alt=""
Here is how to read the headings on a map - apologies for the fruit-flavored style if that offends anyone’s sensibilities. The angle and color tells headingat a given mement, tehe direction the nose is pointing. Magnetic heading, which the FDR works with, are just about 10° higher compared to headings based on geographic north, since the magnetic north pole at that time was about ten degrees west of the true north. Read zero also as 360, due north, green. Here the plane starts out deep blue – due east, roughly 90° from north, 100 mag on the FDR - and its final heading is about 60°. Add ten to get magnetic, and this is what the FDR says – 70°.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8e7f/b8e7fb27d7e0cfcf1aaabcfefb40aa8d9d09b5af" alt=""
The erred NTSB working copy animation, used by Pilots for 9/11 Truth, matches as well the official loop; their “final maneuver” video starts out at 9:34:03, turn just starting, and straightening out from 9:36:45-9:37:15 The onscreen mag heading dial roughly matches the other FDR data, settling on 70 after the loop – but of course the on-screen animation somehow ends up twenty degrees off from that, which is what places it “too far to the left” to have impacted the Pentagon, as the Pilots discovered…
Sources and editing: Coming
[1] Phillips, Don. “Pentagon Crash Highlights a Radar Gap.” Washington Post. November 3, 2001. Page A06. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A32597-2001Nov2¬Found=true
[2] "The Vice President appears on Meet the Press with Tim Russert." Camp David, Maryland. September 16 2001. http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident/news-speeches/speeches/vp20010916.html
[3] "Primary Target - THE PENTAGON." CBS News. September 21 2001. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/11/national/main310721.shtml
[4] "`Get These Planes on the Ground' - Air Traffic Controllers Recall Sept. 11," ABC News, October 24 2001. http://web.archive.org/web/20011024150915/http://abcnews.go.com/sections/2020/2020/2020_011024_atc_feature.html
[5] National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. The 9/11 Commission Report. map: p. 33. Citation of Flight Path Study: Page 459, source 59 for chapter 1. Explanation of the loop on page 9.
[6] FPS
[7] Specialist’s Factual Report of Investigation: Digital Flight Data Recorder . NTSB document number: DCA01MA064 National Transportation Safety Board, Vehicle Records Division. January 31 2002. PDF download link: http://www.ntsb.gov/info/AAL77_fdr.pdf
2 comments:
Glad to see you working on this.
I've seen eyewitness testimony, and even radar data that places a plane SE of the White House. This plane was even captured on video.
The reason why I'm mentioning this, is because when I was analyzing the eyewitness testimony, I got confused about the flight path because I assumed there was only one plane. I had several placing a plane near the White House—even NEADS was “in a frenzy” about this plane which appeared to me to contradict the NTSB data. After doing more research I found the video with the plane by the White House. It appears to be flying very low, and even secret service agents were reportedly concerned about it. According to the article below it is very likely a 4-engine, military, E-4B plane.
http://www.rense.com/general76/missing.htm
In other words there was another plane besides the one that allegedly hit the Pentagon—near the time of the Pentagon strike!
I believed that this was the plane that hit the Pentagon at first… until I realized it was a 2nd plane. Here are some clips of the plane:
http://www.youtube.com/v/gGSwve_BU9I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux_AIqD3S8s
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2...36&q=bbc+9%2F11
Very interesting stuff worth noting.
Thanks A
There's the C-130 of course, scoping out the Pentagon just after the crash cuasing some confusion, as well as the E4B ween over Washington - I can't say why it was there exactly, but there was supposed to be a drill that morning - Global Guardian, I believe - that involved several E4Bs in a nuke emergency scenario or something. I haven't looked into all this closely but should...
Unfortunately what I'll be posting on - the wrong flight path (the 270 loop on yellow map) is not related to this confusion, at least not at the point I'm looking at.
Post a Comment